Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 1358 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 7% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 266 vs 249 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $1355.00 vs $1900.00
- Up to 33% better value when playing Lost Ark than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $5.09 vs $7.63 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 64 vs 44 threads
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 145 vs 280 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
266
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1355
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,355 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361 minutes ago
Buy for $1,900 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 22 |
64 | Threads | 44 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 145 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |