Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9940X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 634 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9940X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i9-9940X - 236 vs 234 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $1355.00 vs $1388.88
- Up to 3% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i9-9940X - $5.74 vs $5.94 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9940X - 64 vs 28 threads
Advantages of Core i9-9940X
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 165 vs 280 Watts
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
236
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1355
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,355 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 274 minutes ago
Buy for $1,388.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 272 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Core i9-9940X |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 14 |
64 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 165 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |