Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 17 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 417 vs 406 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 165 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $894.99 vs $1388.88
- Up to 34% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-9940X - $2.20 vs $3.33 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9940X - 48 vs 28 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
417
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.33/FPS
66%
Price, $
$1388.88
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,388.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 254 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
406
97%
Value, $/FPS
$2.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$894.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $894.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 254 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9940X | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 24 |
28 | Threads | 48 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |