Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1555 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $894.99 vs $899.99
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 48 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 287 vs 272 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $3.14 vs $3.29 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
272
95%
Value, $/FPS
$3.29/FPS
95%
Price, $
$894.99
100%
Buy for $894.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
287
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$899.99
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
48 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
250 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |