Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 187 vs 178 FPS
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $621.95 vs $899.99
- Up to 27% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-13400F - $3.49 vs $4.81 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.81/FPS
73%
Price, $
$899.99
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
178
95%
Value, $/FPS
$3.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$621.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $621.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400F | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |