In Atomfall, the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
No clear advantages
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Feb 07, 2020
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 65 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Average FPS
222 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
91%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
74%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
38%
L3 Cache
36 MB
14%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Feb 7th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 7th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $3,990.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| TRX4 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 280 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
