In Atomfall, the Core i9-14900F is same performance as the Core Ultra 5 245KF. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $345 more expensive!
Core i9-14900F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245KF
- Is 9 months and 16 days newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jan 08, 2024
- Is 9 months and 16 days newer
- Up to 62% cheaper – $214.99 vs $559.99
- Up to 62% cheaper
- Up to 62% better value in Atomfall – $0.87 vs $2.28/FPS
- Up to 62% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-14900F vs Core Ultra 5 245KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559.99
38%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
38%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$214.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900F vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900F vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
48%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
88%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
58%
L3 Cache
24 MB
67%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
90%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| $524.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1851 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
