In Atomfall, the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Feb 07, 2020
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 125 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Average FPS
222 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
90%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
78%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
50%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
31%
L3 Cache
30 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Feb 7th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 7th, 2020 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| $3,990.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| TRX4 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 280 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
