Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2259 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $235.00 vs $432.98
- Up to 23% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i9-14900K - $1.21 vs $1.57 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 42% better in Dota 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 276 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
195
71%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$235
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 315 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
276
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
77%
Price, $
$432.98
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for $432.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 313 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |