Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 3700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 3700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1563 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 3700X.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 17% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 3700X - 225 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $129.29 vs $433.00
- Up to 65% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-14900K - $0.67 vs $1.92 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $433 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
192
85%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$129.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $129.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900K | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |