Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1547 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $235.00 vs $269.95
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Borderlands 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 248 vs 216 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Buy for $235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 308 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
248
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$269.95
87%
FPS Winner
Buy for $269.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 307 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |