Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250 outperforms Xeon X5690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3250 is 1253 days newer than Xeon X5690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon X5690 - 170 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon X5690 - 53 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5995 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5690 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Xeon | Collection | Pentium |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |