Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 2298 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5680
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 28% better in War Thunder than Xeon X5680 - 171 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5680 - 16 vs 12 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2434 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |