Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 4048 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 9% better in Dead Space than Xeon X5680 - 158 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |