Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 8% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-10320 - 124 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $120.0 vs $140.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-11600 - $1.04 vs $1.13 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
115
92%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |