Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Xeon X5670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1995 days newer than Xeon X5670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5670
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon X5670 - 183 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon X5670 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 274 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5670 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |