Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 3513 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 95 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 5% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon X5650 - 262 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5650 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon X5650
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i9-9900KS
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 127 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
