Buy on Amazon
$99.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1995 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon W3680 - 164 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2662 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
