Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 4812 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 29% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon W3565 - 196 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon W3565 - 60 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3565 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
196
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $138.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10680 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 60 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |