Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 3833 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon W3565 - 132 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3565 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3565 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3565 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $130.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |