Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4896 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 17% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon W3550 - 195 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3550 - 32 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$435
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |