Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 3619 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon W3550 - 209 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon W3550 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3550 - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
209
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$395
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2534 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |