Buy on Amazon
$445
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 2878 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3550
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 5% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon W3550 - 122 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3550 - 16 vs 8 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$445
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7 i7-7820X Octa-core 8 Core 3.60 GHz Processor Socket R4 LGA-2066
Buy for $445 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon W3550
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
