Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Xeon W3530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1637 days newer than Xeon W3530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 19% better in War Thunder than Xeon W3530 - 153 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon W3530 - 85 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3530 - 12 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Xeon W3530
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3530 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
