Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Xeon W3530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 3698 days newer than Xeon W3530.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon W3530 - 159 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3530 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3530 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3530 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon W3530
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3530 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
