Key Differences
In short — FX-8370 outperforms Xeon W3530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8370 is 1631 days newer than Xeon W3530.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon W3530 - 168 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon W3530 - 125 vs 130 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$234.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $234.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3530 | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Xeon | Collection | FX |
Bloomfield | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |