Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Xeon W3530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 3698 days newer than Xeon W3530.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 78% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon W3530 - 414 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon W3530 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3530 - 20 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
414
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$260
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $260 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3530 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |