Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2067 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $234.98 vs $275.98
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 24% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-8370 - 222 vs 179 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-8370 - $1.24 vs $1.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $234.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5145 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
222
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$275.98
85%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |