Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon W-3175X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1070 days newer than Xeon W-3175X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 56 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 5% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon W-3175X - 391 vs 373 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
391
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $74.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon W | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 2 |
56 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
255 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |