Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms Xeon Silver 4116 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 189 days older than Xeon Silver 4116.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Silver 4116
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon Silver 4116 - 181 vs 173 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon Silver 4116 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon Silver 4116 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon Silver 4116 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon Silver | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
85 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |