Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 4018 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E5645 - 239 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5645 - 16 vs 12 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
239
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, $
$237
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $237 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |