Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3698 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 21% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Xeon E5645 - 180 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5645 - 16 vs 12 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1713 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |