Buy on Amazon
$186
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 2760 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 11% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5645 - 170 vs 153 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i7-8700K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$186
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-8700K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.7GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for $186 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i7-8700K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700K |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Xeon E5645 or Core i7-8700K
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, 1920 x 1080, Ultra+
65 FPS
$23.08/FPS
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Core i7-8700K
16 GB, 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,499.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
