Buy on Amazon
$120
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3698 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 19% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E5620 - 115 vs 97 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
115
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i3-10320 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110320
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2720 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
