Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 4312 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5620 - 204 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 60 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$121.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $121.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3381 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |