Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 3055 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5520
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5520 - 119 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5520 - 24 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17050 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Gainestown | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |