Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms Xeon E5520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8350 is 1303 days newer than Xeon E5520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5520
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5520 - 319 vs 315 FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
319
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3049 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5520 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon | Collection | FX |
Gainestown | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |