Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1470 days newer than Xeon E5-2697 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 151 vs 145 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$557.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $557.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13576 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |