Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E5-2696 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2696 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900F - 36 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 119% better in Immortals of Aveum than Xeon E5-2696 v3 - 94 vs 43 FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$435
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2710 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 24 |
36 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |