Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Xeon E5-2696 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 2437 days newer than Xeon E5-2696 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400H - 36 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2696 v3 - 155 vs 149 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2696 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400H |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell E | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
18 | Cores | 6 |
36 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
