Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Xeon E5-2690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3297 days newer than Xeon E5-2690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 5% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E5-2690 - 226 vs 215 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 65 vs 135 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
226
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.25
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |