Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Xeon E5-2690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1764 days newer than Xeon E5-2690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E5-2690 - 147 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 51 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
135 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |