Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Xeon E5-2687W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3966 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 123% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-2687W - 565 vs 253 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 65 vs 150 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
565
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$368.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $368.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |