Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon E5-2687W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3045 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 31% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-2687W - 599 vs 459 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 105 vs 150 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 24 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
599
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$379
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |