Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms Xeon E5-2687W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 3591 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2687W - 191 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 65 vs 150 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2687W
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i9-12900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 150 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
