Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 2792 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 24% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2680 - 750 vs 605 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 127 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2680
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i9-9900KS
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 127 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
