Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 2679 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 14% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2680 - 136 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 24 vs 16 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$395
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4038 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |