Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 outperforms FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 is 462 days older than FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 130 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 16 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 220 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |