Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3857 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-2680 - 592 vs 507 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 32 vs 16 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
592
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$471.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $471.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60979 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
542
18.230743356878573%
Multi-Core
3336
16.596189244316204%
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |