Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3313 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 115 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 22% better in Valheim than Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 232 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2680 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i9-13900K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 24 |
| 20 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
